<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quality In Perception</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stationsupport.wordpress.com/2008/07/08/quality-in-perception/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stationsupport.wordpress.com/2008/07/08/quality-in-perception/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:24:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: doug lefler</title>
		<link>http://stationsupport.wordpress.com/2008/07/08/quality-in-perception/#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator>doug lefler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 03:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stationsupport.wordpress.com/?p=44#comment-183</guid>
		<description>I was recently told if I opened a thread concerning a issue I had with cs my account would be banned. when I asked to have a supervisor review the thread I was told that it would be banned. WOW, now that is cs. In the email is states if your not satisfied then reopen the thread, what it doesn&#039;t say is that soe cs will ban your account if they don&#039;t want to deal with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was recently told if I opened a thread concerning a issue I had with cs my account would be banned. when I asked to have a supervisor review the thread I was told that it would be banned. WOW, now that is cs. In the email is states if your not satisfied then reopen the thread, what it doesn&#8217;t say is that soe cs will ban your account if they don&#8217;t want to deal with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doug lefler</title>
		<link>http://stationsupport.wordpress.com/2008/07/08/quality-in-perception/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>doug lefler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 09:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stationsupport.wordpress.com/?p=44#comment-182</guid>
		<description>I recently requested support and wasn&#039;t happy with the answers I was given. I followed the instructions on the email to reopen the thread if I was not satisfied and was threatened with my account being banned if I re opened the thread again. I was always very nice and never vulgar in my thread. Is this the type of customer service you expect to provide?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently requested support and wasn&#8217;t happy with the answers I was given. I followed the instructions on the email to reopen the thread if I was not satisfied and was threatened with my account being banned if I re opened the thread again. I was always very nice and never vulgar in my thread. Is this the type of customer service you expect to provide?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Henry Hall</title>
		<link>http://stationsupport.wordpress.com/2008/07/08/quality-in-perception/#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Henry Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 03:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stationsupport.wordpress.com/?p=44#comment-179</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m replying to this thread because I feel my comments are in good ties to this subject. Customer service and Perception of Quality. I have 2 suggestions on how to make EQ a healthy and a live game again. First, I really and whole-heartedly feel that if you changed Zek to old Rallos Zek rules 1 item loot and all coin with 4 lvls up and down of the attacker/attackee and email all the accounts on that server that have played there of the new changes, I have no doubts that people will return to the game and you&#039;ll have more paying accounts live again. 

2nd suggestion; If you change it so all new paying accounts are free until you reach lvl 65, you&#039;ll have a lot of old zone content filling up again and the population will grow again. 

I have always loved EQ and I really want to see it thrive again. With these suggested changes made, especially the Zek suggestion, I know people will return.

Please pass these 2 suggestions to the Top, I know you want to make more money, and we want to see the game have better population.

-J. Henry Hall</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m replying to this thread because I feel my comments are in good ties to this subject. Customer service and Perception of Quality. I have 2 suggestions on how to make EQ a healthy and a live game again. First, I really and whole-heartedly feel that if you changed Zek to old Rallos Zek rules 1 item loot and all coin with 4 lvls up and down of the attacker/attackee and email all the accounts on that server that have played there of the new changes, I have no doubts that people will return to the game and you&#8217;ll have more paying accounts live again. </p>
<p>2nd suggestion; If you change it so all new paying accounts are free until you reach lvl 65, you&#8217;ll have a lot of old zone content filling up again and the population will grow again. </p>
<p>I have always loved EQ and I really want to see it thrive again. With these suggested changes made, especially the Zek suggestion, I know people will return.</p>
<p>Please pass these 2 suggestions to the Top, I know you want to make more money, and we want to see the game have better population.</p>
<p>-J. Henry Hall</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
